Indica dominant hybrid

Miracle Whip

Miracle Whip is an indica dominant hybrid. Its flavor notes include pine, woody and sweet.

Updated

Contribute a photograph

Strain at a glance

Reported type
Indica dominant hybrid
Reported THC
20%–24%
Reported CBD
2%
View the classification diagram
Classification
Miracle Whip classification: 40% sativa, 60% indica.

Classification is conventional. Cannabinoid measurements vary by batch.

Reported lineage
Cookies N Cream × Starfighter × Colombian
Reported flavors
Citrus, Pine, Sour, Sweet, Woody
Reported effects
Euphoria, Focus, Giggly, Happy, Relaxing, Sociable

Miracle Whip genetics

Cookies N Cream × Starfighter × Colombian.

The conventional classification is 40% sativa and 60% indica.

Flavor and aroma

Miracle Whip combines pine, woody, sweet and sour in its flavor profile. Additional notes include citrus.

The aroma adds flowery and earthy.

Flavor & aroma
Miracle Whip sensory notes: Pine; Woody; Flowery.

Miracle Whip effects

Reported Miracle Whip effects include euphoria, focus, giggling, a happier mood, relaxation, sociability and uplift.

The descriptions combine a mental component with physical relaxation. The category label alone does not explain that balance.

Miracle Whip THC level and CBD

The published Miracle Whip THC level is 20–24%.

CBD is listed at 2%.

For a specific product, use its batch laboratory results rather than treating these figures as universal strain specifications.

Published cannabinoid range
Miracle Whip: THC 20%–24%; CBD 2%. Scale zero to 35 percent.

Flower appearance

Described visual traits include grape-shaped, neon green, orange, white, frosty and trichomes.

Explore the indica dominant hybrid directory for other profiles in this classification.

Questions about Miracle Whip

Is Miracle Whip indica or sativa? It is classified as an indica dominant hybrid. The listed split is 40% sativa and 60% indica.

What does Miracle Whip taste like? The available description includes pine, woody and sweet.

Who bred Miracle Whip? An original breeder has not been established in the available evidence.

Profile updates

History tracking began . This establishes a baseline; it is not a new source review.

No meaningful changes recorded since this baseline.

Source-check dates, private drafts and SEO edits do not count as profile updates.

Follow profile updates with RSS

Image credits & editorial sources

Community reviews

Experiences shared here are personal reports. Every review is moderated.

No published reviews yet. Have experience with this strain? Share what you noticed.

Write a review

Write a review

Describe your experience. No links or promotions. Every review is checked before publication.

Used privately for moderation and spam prevention. Never published.
40–2,000 characters. Focus on this strain and your own experience.
Photographs (optional)

Up to 3 JPEG, PNG or WebP photos, 5 MB each, at least 320 × 320 pixels and at most 24 megapixels. Photos stay private until approved.

How contributed photographs are used

Start your review to prepare the secure form.

Recently viewed

Optional browsing history, saved only in this browser. You can clear it or turn it off at any time.

Compare strains

Compare up to three published profiles. Strain figures describe reported records and can vary between samples.