Indica strains

Find a strain by name, classification, or first letter.

Browse A–Z

266 strainsShowing 1–24

Clear filters
Composition not reported
THC13%–18%

Afghan #1

Indica
Composition not reported
THC15%–20%
Composition not reported
THC18%–19%
Afghan OG cannabis photograph

Afghan OG

Indica
Composition not reported
THC21%
Afghani cannabis photograph

Afghani

Indica
Composition not reported
THC16%–20%
Composition not reported
THC6%–8%
Composition not reported
THC21%–25%
Composition not reported
THC19%–20%
Composition not reported
THC16%–19%
BC Kush cannabis photograph

BC Kush

Indica
Composition not reported
THC27%

Indica strains are entries the catalog source places in its indica category. This page collects those records so you can compare the information actually available for each name, including reported cannabinoid ranges and source links. An indica label is not a laboratory measurement, a verified pedigree or a promise of a particular experience. Some entries have detailed reference notes and identified photographs; others currently contain a name and a smaller set of sourced fields.

Comparing indica strains

Start with the name you want to investigate, then follow its profile to the original catalog listing. The same name can be used for different selections or breeder releases. Where HempLookup has expanded reference notes, those notes identify their sources and retain material naming or parentage disagreements. A directory classification is one field in that record, rather than proof that two similarly named products are genetically identical.

Reading reported THC and CBD

The directory displays available THC and CBD values as percentages reported by the source. A range belongs to the reference entry; it is not a certificate of analysis for a product in front of you. A missing value means it was not recorded, rather than zero. If reported indica and sativa proportions conflict, the profile omits the inconsistent ratio. This lets you compare recorded information without treating an incomplete field as a measurement.

Photographs, sources and contributions

Photographs illustrate specimens identified by their contributors. A visible credit links to the photographer or source and the relevant reuse terms. An image cannot authenticate genetics, and missing strain photographs are not replaced with unrelated flower images. Readers can submit their own photographs with a review; both the review and the photographs require moderation before publication.

Browse the full strain directory to compare other classifications. Read sources and methodology for the distinction between catalog fields, researched reference notes and community reports, or suggest a sourced correction. The category label used here can be followed back to the AllBud source category.